You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘SEO – Commentary’ category.
Some see today’s search results as tumultuous and uncertain. New sites can break out of the sandbox or completely avoid it altogether and be listed with the big boys without the site age and backlinks. Page rank is being beaten out by content siloed websites with great internal link structure.
For some it is like a wave that the surfer waits for to ride only to be dumped into the sea. For the many that do everything right and then get slammed in the SERPS, there is a reason. These machines that index the web are running on particular algorithms and even though the SERPS may seem like a result of random placement, they are not like 52 card pick-up at all.
The recent trend of big search has been commented upon often on this website. It seems that all that we knew is in a continuous shake-up, but this is not the case because the big search players are moving to perfect the art of delivering truly organic results. Currently great content and internal linking strategy is being rewarded and old spammy schemes are being penalized.
On one hand you have rewards for good and on the other you have penalties for being linked to a site that has bad marks against it. New site owners that have true professionals working the SEO of their sites are enjoying fantastic results. Some websites however, are experiencing penalties by association. Even with established, aged sites we are seeing them being dumped off the first page and sometimes even far lower.
What is it? What is going on is just what I predicted in big search’s strive for organic results. Backlinks, whether contained in news articles, press releases, or raw incoming links need to be checked. Right now, a new link with anchor text placed on a penalized website will tank your site on any search for that keyword or keyword phrase in the given anchor text. New potential links have to be checked and a page rank check is hardly enough.
It seems page rank is an item that is setting idle for now and while it is a factor in the SERP placement, its value is stagnant. A page with high page rank can be penalized to death and you would never know it. Google and Yahoo are very similar in their algo’s regarding the penalty placement in the SERPS. The bar graphs on tracking software shows parallel movement in these two search engines. Bing is another story and we are still trying to figure them out as they seem more stable but a bit also harder to see movement.
So folks, it is your links! If you track your backlinks, you can begin to undo some damage. Visit the Seopenalty.com site and try out their service. You will be surprised at the sites that are penalized heavily for spam and related tactics that have been allowed on the sites. Focus on Anchor Text both within and outside your site. Remember: If it is too easy to develop a link = RED FLAG. As always, develop quality content and keep it fresh. Use the social networks to prop up your links and pages.
Have fun because without challenge there can be no great achievement. Ride the waves and stay on top with a successful strategy.
I am making this a short post because it is late. I found a great tool the allows webmasters to check for penalties against websites. This is a fantastic tool because if you go by Page rank alone, you will find that your hard work with press releases and backlinks could be digging you in a hole.
Check all sites before linking or you will tank your site! Some site are heavily penalized by Google and Yahoo in particular and you will tank your own ranking if you link up with them. I found this site because I was looking for where I caused my own demise when I was sinking in the SERPS. I was able to undo the damage, thankfully.
Check this out: “Seopenalty.com.” Here is a screen-shot:
-Bob W
The Sandbox Effect – Double Double Cross?
I have written about it. Many people have written about this grey topic that is a negative to the website designer’s vocation. The sandbox effect is real and it is currently an obstacle that stands in between you and getting a newly launched website noticed in the SERPS. There are interesting observations however that you may want to consider.
We expected Yahoo and especially Bing to employ a new site filter aggressively because of the “quality vs. quantity” mantra that Bing has exuded from the rafters of late. Google is expected to employ this type of filter also as it tries so desperately to return to organic quality results.
First, let us explore the reason for this filter and then the current implications of its use by big search. First of all it is the constant work of those who have become known as “black hats” that causes these giant purveyors of search to endeavor to control their successes. Automated linking schemes and reciprocal linking strategies threatened the very core element of big search rankings. These efforts were artificial and to get your site up there in the SERPS, you had to employ some of them because of the influences of those that hijacked the SERPS. Now everything has changed. After much activity in the shadows, the black hats evolved to hijack the pay-per-click marketplace. Finally after the threat was realized and big search recognized that real people doing real searches were getting frustrated with spammed results, Bing came out and voiced the intent to bring up the quality level of their search offering. With the merger with Yahoo, Microsoft’s intent to clean up search was taken very seriously by Google. Google took on a proactive approach even cleansing tens of thousands of paying members of its Awords program. Google also employs an aggressive new site filter. The strange part of the current state of new site SERPS placement is that Bing has opened its doors to new sites. Yahoo has also not filtered new sites out of the SERPS.
I cannot take risks with clients’ websites and their internet exposure. What I do is to take a lot of risk with my own sites. Now in launching a new site, it appears that if you are conservative about your back-linking strategy, only seeking one way back-links from high ranking sites along with social marketing and press releases, you can hit the SERPS within a week! Now this is limited to Yahoo and Bing. I have had Google crawl new websites, obviously indexing the pages but not listing them listed in Webmaster Tools. After about 24 hrs. or so, the new sites that were showing up on Google highly ranked in the SERPS, because of my expert in page and careful linking strategies. Then they drop off the face of the earth. A check of Webmaster Tools reveals that the sitemaps are updated every day as I update materials on the sites, but no listing of URL’s being indexed is available. This is certainly reflective of the reality that Google indexed my brand new sites and then employed a new site filter that has sent them to the sandbox. Below is a screen capture of the sitemap page in Webmaster Tools.
Is the old double-double cross that we see? Who knows exactly why but we can see what is going on right now. Think about this for a minute. Bing exudes this grand intention to make their brand of search “Bing & decide” a clean and organic new style of experience for the end user that even feels good to advertisers. Independent business owners and operators are attracted to this idea of “Bing & decide.” The powerful new look of Bing attracts people while Google maintains its clean (but now more cluttered) look. Google looks over its proverbial shoulder and decides to act after the new Bing gives Google something to focus upon. Google decides to purge itself of its junk that threatens its organic search results. Google has done a lot of work and it is actively doing “Spring cleaning.”
As Bing watches while Google begins to clean up its act, the marketplace is going through its own purging. In brick and mortar establishments across this land many companies are going belly-up and established websites are shutting down. New start-ups are getting ready to capitalize on the Spring, post-tax season, early-summer sales season. Now these are the new entrepreneurs and even the businesses are left standing that want to try a new website launch to get the exposure they need for growth. These are the businesses that will pay for the services that big search provides. Bing is looking to peel off some of the advertisers from Google. It won’t be hard to do.
Google has made a lot of people angry with its big purge of advertisers. There are many that were caught in the snare and dumped that were not guilty of anything. By opening up and reducing the burden upon new websites, Bing may just be positioned in a happier place to capitalize on this big negative.
Speaking of negatives, for a website design company or an SEO company, the divulging of the real aspects of the sandbox effect to you, a business owner may affect your decision to move on a campaign to exploit free search. The SEO’s that do not tell you the whole story are not looking out for your best interests. You should know exactly what is happening and the prospects of getting your site highly ranked in the SERPS. Now is the time to move and to get your website ranked. Engage the services of the best SEO professional you can find. I am making the argument that I am your man.
-Bob W
New Sites: Sandbox on Google
There are theories (called sandbox theories) as to why new sites take time to be listed on some SERPS on Google. The “Sandbox” effect was a theory years ago that was generally accepted among SEO experts. The sandbox theory was an explanation in response to apparent delays in new sites getting into the results in the SERPS. For a brief time at the end of 2003 to 2004, the sandbox was eliminated for a while and there was a “reverse sandbox” effect theorized because new sites for several months during the period, gained almost immediate and seemingly undeserved SERP results.
There is disagreement among the experts as to the existence of the sandbox and how the indexing of new sites works, but there is something going on that limits new sites from reaching the top. The general consensus is that because of spammers and manipulators, new sites are filtered out and some refer to this as the sandbox effect. The impetus for the sandbox effect is simple. Black Hats have caused sandbox measures to be employed. Some website owners have developed new sites, or spread a large site over several URL’s with smaller pages of specific topics for the purpose of back-linking to the main site and gaining high SERP results for the main site. Google rejects any efforts to manipulate the rankings. Google, Yahoo, Bing and the rest will catch up to the manipulators that affect the authenticity of the SERPS. There is an admitted sandbox effort over at Bing. Hopefully in this new age of fast and changing content, search will find a way to eliminate the sandbox for viable new sites.
The need for the sandbox effect just demonstrates that the unsavory among us are taxing the search engines from doing their job, delivering truly organic results. The search engines are designed to deliver results from popular websites. These sites that rank are supposed to be from a result of human beings visiting the sites and back-linking to interesting sites. These are human votes of confidence. The vast majority of links on the web are generated by requests from site owners to other site owners requesting in-organic backlinks. Herein lays the problem. We see that the search engines are not equipped to handle the situation without major resources being expended or measures such as the sandbox being utilized. A newer way of indexing sites may move to the fore.
Sites that generate many, even thousands of back-links in a short period of time are suspect. search engines can pick these sites out easily and should forget the sandbox and put them on an island far away. This is not the case however. These sites seem to be back in the SERP rankings in several months after being penalized in a type of sandbox.
We shall see the results of the efforts put forth to quash the enemies of organic results. In the interim, we have the reality of viable sites being penalized for the sins of spammers. The current average to expect for your new site to be fully resulted in the SERPS and out of the sandbox is about 6 – 8 months.
A gradual incline in the number of back-links is considered best to keep your new site off the radar screens. Favorable SERP results should be expected from a quality SEO effort on a new website in about the 6 month timeframe. Existing sites can see almost immediate results (a month is a reasonable time-frame to expect results).

keywords from this page
Keyword density for this page is listed above.
The theory behind the sandbox is a viable one.






SEO – Don’t Redesign If It Is Not Necessary
April 3, 2010 in advertising, NJ SEO, Philadelphia SEO, Princeton SEO, Search News, SEO - Backlinks in Flux, SEO - Commentary, SEO - news, SEO - Page-Rank PR, SEO - Search News you can use, SEO Advice, SEO Rip-Off Free Evaluation | Tags: alalysis, backlinks, design, engine, google, optimization, Philadelphia, Princeton SEO, seo, stategies, website | 2 comments
Let’s stop for a moment and look at the real rift that builds in the misunderstanding of website design as it relates to SEO. For the technologically astute, please humor us for a few moments. For the business owner that has hired on, or engaged the services of multiple “website designers” solely for the purpose of attaining better placement or “rank” in the search engine page results, this posting is for you.
It may seem like all the verbiage, even on this website, is too confusing to understand as far as what this gray area, this fuzzy thing called SEO is all about. We have tried really hard to keep the techno-speak down to a minimum on this website for your benefit. We want you to understand so that you don’t spin your wheels.
We do not want you to hook up with another website design firm so that just maybe they have the right stuff to get your site to the top of the search engine page results and that maybe your potential clients can find you and will contact your company for your services. A website design firm is not an SEO firm, necessarily. The two endeavors are related and a company that does one can certainly do the other, but for all the hours of design and painstaking work that goes into a quality website, provisions for SEO need to be in place every step of the way. This is all too often not the case, as if the optimizing part can be done later.
It can be done later but there is always re-hashing of old content, internal structure and pages so it is really better if the whole project can be done at once. Usually, a company specializes in one discipline or the other or if a company is large enough, separate departments can be employed for the desired results.
SEO, short for “search engine optimization” is a separate type of specialty and a certain focus upon current trends in the internet and search engine placement must be in place because of the waves of changes we see daily in the search engine technology. Today, the best method for staging a website roll-out is to have the SEO professional follow the very astute designer in the process of working a website to its fullest potential for search engine placement. The SEO specialist needs to take an SEO optimized website and begin to tweak it and work in the associated back-linking strategies and check for internal linking, etc. Most website designers are familiar with much of the basics and will provide optimized work for the SEO specialist.
Today’s climate requires copywriters to be employed by the SEO practitioner for the full implementation of an SEO campaign. Leveraging content is now a vital part of getting your website to the top in the search engine results pages (SERPS) and a few carefully crafted pages will no longer do for permanent ranking strategies. We have competition in the SEO field and your competitors will be working to overtake your website and push you down to the second page of the SERPS.
A good design form will have an SEO specialist and sometimes you will find a specialist that can deliver on both elements. One without the other is a waste anyway you look at it. If you have a good and functioning website but have been passed by in search engine ranking, an SEO professional is who you need to call. Another website redesign will not work in and of itself. If you want to start over, remember that site structure being changed may hurt you in the loss of the exposure that you already have. If you have had an amateur working old linking schemes, stop right now and contact a professional to take inventory of your current situation. You website could be ruined for the search engines for some time to come and undoing amateur work that is very hard to track down all over the internet can be a disaster and starting over may be a hard choice to that has to be made. Before you redesign however, allow an SEO specialist to take a look and to analyze your particular situation.
A website that cannot be found is no good to anyone. Usually, turning around an existing website and keeping the good elements in place can achieve more than you could imagine. You don’t change your engine in your car if it only needs a tune-up.
We are seeing web designers that are selling complete rebuilds that do not produce any more sales leads than the old website they replaced. We are seeing this quite often. Let us take a look free of charge and offer you what you need, rather than opting for duplication of work already done. Yes, we may have to fix some things, but does not that make more sense than spending money on what you don’t need?
-Bob W