You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘SEO – Commentary’ category.

Let’s stop for a moment and look at the real rift that builds in the misunderstanding of website design as it relates to SEO. For the technologically astute, please humor us for a few moments. For the business owner that has hired on, or engaged the services of multiple “website designers” solely for the purpose of attaining better placement or “rank” in the search engine page results, this posting is for you.

It may seem like all the verbiage, even on this website, is too confusing to understand as far as what this gray area, this fuzzy thing called SEO is all about. We have tried really hard to keep the techno-speak down to a minimum on this website for your benefit. We want you to understand so that you don’t spin your wheels.

We do not want you to hook up with another website design firm so that just maybe they have the right stuff to get your site to the top of the search engine page results and that maybe your potential clients can find you and will contact your company for your services. A website design firm is not an SEO firm, necessarily. The two endeavors are related and a company that does one can certainly do the other, but for all the hours of design and painstaking work that goes into a quality website, provisions for SEO need to be in place every step of the way. This is all too often not the case, as if the optimizing part can be done later.

It can be done later but there is always re-hashing of old content, internal structure and pages so it is really better if the whole project can be done at once. Usually, a company specializes in one discipline or the other or if a company is large enough, separate departments can be employed for the desired results.

SEO, short for “search engine optimization” is a separate type of specialty and a certain focus upon current trends in the internet and search engine placement must be in place because of the waves of changes we see daily in the search engine technology. Today, the best method for staging a website roll-out is to have the SEO professional follow the very astute designer in the process of working a website to its fullest potential for search engine placement. The SEO specialist needs to take an SEO optimized website and begin to tweak it and work in the associated back-linking strategies and check for internal linking, etc. Most website designers are familiar with much of the basics and will provide optimized work for the SEO specialist.

Today’s climate requires copywriters to be employed by the SEO practitioner for the full implementation of an SEO campaign. Leveraging content is now a vital part of getting your website to the top in the search engine results pages (SERPS) and a few carefully crafted pages will no longer do for permanent ranking strategies. We have competition in the SEO field and your competitors will be working to overtake your website and push you down to the second page of the SERPS.

A good design form will have an SEO specialist and sometimes you will find a specialist that can deliver on both elements. One without the other is a waste anyway you look at it. If you have a good and functioning website but have been passed by in search engine ranking, an SEO professional is who you need to call. Another website redesign will not work in and of itself. If you want to start over, remember that site structure being changed may hurt you in the loss of the exposure that you already have. If you have had an amateur working old linking schemes, stop right now and contact a professional to take inventory of your current situation. You website could be ruined for the search engines for some time to come and undoing amateur work that is very hard to track down all over the internet can be a disaster and starting over may be a hard choice to that has to be made. Before you redesign however, allow an SEO specialist to take a look and to analyze your particular situation.

A website that cannot be found is no good to anyone. Usually, turning around an existing website and keeping the good elements in place can achieve more than you could imagine. You don’t change your engine in your car if it only needs a tune-up.

We are seeing web designers that are selling complete rebuilds that do not produce any more sales leads than the old website they replaced. We are seeing this quite often. Let us take a look free of charge and offer you what you need, rather than opting for duplication of work already done. Yes, we may have to fix some things, but does not that make more sense than spending money on what you don’t need?

-Bob W

April 2, 2010

Social Media is taking off among the youth but also within all communities as the popularity of these sites increases. People frequent these new doorways to the internet. As they share their interests and day-to-day happenings with each other, people are flocking to these sites. One can communicate with hundreds or even thousands of friends in a few keystrokes.

Never has the world seen such a network that literally has the power to engage the human spirit so effectively. We may see entire governments overthrown by these sites one day. When it comes to likes and dislikes, everyone is not the of same vein and debate is natural. Entire communities of folks interested in topics that range the gamut, daily communicate on the internet to share information and links to interesting sites.

The power of this raw force of networking has been seen in the city of Philadelphia of late, as in other parts of the country. So called, “Flash Mobs,” are appearing and causing disruption, damage and problems across the city of Philadelphia. Youth that are looking for action and are able to communicate by way of their hand-held devices on the networking sites and gather in mass to disrupt a given area of the city at will.

This is about the power of these sites and that people can communicate with each other in real time. It is no mystery that the sites more fluid in nature like Facebook and Twitter are more poplar to people looking to engage. How can a business harness the power of these sites to increase sales?

These sites like Facebook and Twitter use a global “nofollow” attribute in their “robots.txt” and generally links are considered dead to the machines that crawl the web. My opinion is that they are picked up and crawled anyway by big search. There is some debate about this. The links on many of these fluid sites that use the global “nofollow” designation do not, however get indexed in the search engines. Some sites linked to these sites are indexed by search engines. Take “Digg,” for instance and sites like it that allow spider crawling. These are prime real estate for well written articles and links to interesting sites. Again content reigns supreme and the same link bait ideas are attractive to the social networking folks that share an interest in your good or service.

As stated before, big search will continue to harness the happenings on these social sites so that the search engines remain valid in the internet experience. The power being wielded by these sites has unleashed an attraction to them by Google, Yahoo and Bing. Although the chaff that is known as spam is always going to be prevalent, the social sites are working hard to prevent it and the human element is heavily employed to cancel out the spam artisans. Take “Slashdot” for an example as it marks articles as spam until they are voted upwards by readers to raise them to a page of higher ranking.

So, we must ask if the social sites are helping the quality of big search or are they becoming entities all their own and threatening big search. I think the latter, but as long as people need a place to search for items on the internet, the search engine will remain viable. Google and Yahoo and Bing may be reduced in their ability to garner revenue from pay-per-click listings as copywriting will take on a role that will empower businesses to convey their messages in other ways. One thing is for sure and that is that the old linking schemes are dying a slow death right before our eyes. Another is that quality in site copy will rise to a level of significance never seen before.

Some see today’s search results as tumultuous and uncertain. New sites can break out of the sandbox or completely avoid it altogether and be listed with the big boys without the site age and backlinks. Page rank is being beaten out by content siloed websites with great internal link structure.

For some it is like a wave that the surfer waits for to ride only to be dumped into the sea. For the many that do everything right and then get slammed in the SERPS, there is a reason. These machines that index the web are running on particular algorithms and even though the SERPS may seem like a result of random placement, they are not like 52 card pick-up at all.

The recent trend of big search has been commented upon often on this website. It seems that all that we knew is in a continuous shake-up, but this is not the case because the big search players are moving to perfect the art of delivering truly organic results. Currently great content and internal linking strategy is being rewarded and old spammy schemes are being penalized.

On one hand you have rewards for good and on the other you have penalties for being linked to a site that has bad marks against it. New site owners that have true professionals working the SEO of their sites are enjoying fantastic results. Some websites however, are experiencing penalties by association. Even with established, aged sites we are seeing them being dumped off the first page and sometimes even far lower.

What is it? What is going on is just what I predicted in big search’s strive for organic results. Backlinks, whether contained in news articles, press releases, or raw incoming links need to be checked. Right now, a new link with anchor text placed on a penalized website will tank your site on any search for that keyword or keyword phrase in the given anchor text. New potential links have to be checked and a page rank check is hardly enough.

It seems page rank is an item that is setting idle for now and while it is a factor in the SERP placement, its value is stagnant. A page with high page rank can be penalized to death and you would never know it. Google and Yahoo are very similar in their algo’s regarding the penalty placement in the SERPS. The bar graphs on tracking software shows parallel movement in these two search engines. Bing is another story and we are still trying to figure them out as they seem more stable but a bit also harder to see movement.

So folks, it is your links! If you track your backlinks, you can begin to undo some damage. Visit the Seopenalty.com site and try out their service. You will be surprised at the sites that are penalized heavily for spam and related tactics that have been allowed on the sites. Focus on Anchor Text both within and outside your site. Remember: If it is too easy to develop a link = RED FLAG. As always, develop quality content and keep it fresh. Use the social networks to prop up your links and pages.

Have fun because without challenge there can be no great achievement. Ride the waves and stay on top with a successful strategy.

I am making this a short post because it is late. I found a great tool the allows webmasters to check for penalties against websites. This is a fantastic tool because if you go by Page rank alone, you will find that your hard work with press releases and backlinks could be digging you in a hole.

Check all sites before linking or you will tank your site! Some site are heavily penalized by Google and Yahoo in particular and you will tank your own ranking if you link up with them. I found this site because I was looking for where I caused my own demise when I was sinking in the SERPS. I was able to undo the damage, thankfully.

Check this out: “Seopenalty.com.” Here is a screen-shot:

Check out the site first!

Make sure you run the check before you link!

-Bob W

SEO – Philadelphia, Pa. Business Advertising in a Tough Market

If you are like a lot of folks, you feel the pinch of tough economic times. You ride down the road and see the business closings. The trend is evident in the restaurant industry where dispensable income is lacking and purveyors of fine dining are falling by the wayside. Your own competitors are closing up shop and your business is hanging on by a thread. What do you do? First you have done what all businesses are doing. You cut inventory to a just-in -time model. You cut back on your paid help. You actually are looking at advertising as a place to cut back on expenses, but you need it now more than ever.

You need exposure because guess what? People still need your services. If your company can remain standing, it will capture a large market share upon an upturn in the economy. Because others in your industry have gone belly-up, if your business remains standing, it will surge into profitability when things turn around. So, which advertising avenue will you take to sustain your business? The answer will be governed by your business model and your common sense.

Let’s explore a few advertising models:

Newspapers

Regional companies that service a given area will endeavor to reach potential clients through newspapers. Generally, a hook is employed like an offer or discount to get the immediate results needed to sustain business. Newspapers are temporary and they are expensive. They cater to a specific type of consumer, the shopper that wants a good deal. This type of advertising is like a band-aide that diminishes quickly in results.

Television and Radio Spots

Very effective in developing a brand in a given industry, these very expensive ads deliver a message to a given demographic, the listening audience of a given program. They work, but the cost of the ads has to be transferred to the cost of your good or service. Once you have pulled the trigger on this type of advertising, your sales price is set on the high end of the market. You have to be ready with the appropriate sales and production staff to close the deals and deliver the goods or services. Volume businesses that are set-up to cash in on the big advertising expenditures are the only ones that will benefit from this type of advertising. A roughly 10% close ratio is expected from all the churning of efforts in this model, in most cases.

Direct Mailers

These are affordable, but again like the newspapers a hook that offers a discount or a bait and switch type of ad is the most effective. Close ratios may be in the same numbers as with other media types, 10% to 20% is often expected. If your price is low enough, you can realize a better return on investment as far as gross numbers. When your mailer is done and you have exhausted yourself and your people, the net numbers may be disheartening.

Trade and Social Magazines

If your business is geared to a specific trade, not is a time that very low numbers will be realized because of the economy. Manufacturing and business services benefit mostly from communicating with the trades. Brand recognition is best in these outlets.

Signage

Businesses that put up a sign and letter their vehicles derive a continuing benefit from signage. “A business with no sign is a sign of no business.” Immediate results will be sporadic but the residual effects are sound.

Yellow Pages

The Yellow Pages have long been a staple of modern business advertising. It has long been realized that the Yellow Pages produces a certain type of client. When the fingers-do-the-walking, they are in seek of a better deal. Putting your business in a pool of like businesses that lack ingenuity and sell price will not propel your business anywhere but into mediocrity. Many of the Yellow Page companies are now realizing that they can no longer produce hard copies of their books. Where are the Yellow Pages going” They are going to the internet.

Internet Lead Sources

These establishments are set up and capitalizing on the internet. They are having a hard time keeping up with regional search elements of search. People want to buy regionally so if your good or service won’t fit in a shipping box, you better get with regional search on the internet and compete and beat these middle man operations. The cost is another factor to consider with this type of advertising. You are basically farming out your internet exposure and allowing yourself to be dumped into mediocrity like those businesses lacking vision.

Pay-Per-Click

The various outlets for pay-per-click advertising are diminishing in the results. This goes with the doorways that are growing in Social Media. People are frequenting the 500+ Social Sites and actually getting more information on these sites every day. The days when a majority of people went to their favorite search engine to find something are coming to a close. Expect big search to answer the call because it is in the best interest to better the organic results. Pay-per-click advertising on the major search engines will be diminishing in returns as the Social Media sites evolve and become more subject oriented. Competition will cause every outlet to become more stream lined and big search is shaking in its boots. Your business website will not realize any benefit in the organic SERPS from these efforts. Pay-per-click advertising is a stop gap measure toward immediate results. You be the judge of the effectiveness of these ads.

Business Website with SEO

A business website is much like a business sign, but it is much more in-depth than with the limitations of a sign board. Placement of your sign is important. As stated:

“A notable web-site albeit lacking SEO,

Akin to a vibrant sign-board placed in the middle of a forest,

Never will see traffic and is destined to rot away in insignificance.”

More can be achieved from a website than in all of the above forms of advertising. A business can capitalize on the advertising efforts of its competitors. Think for a moment. Your competitor chooses to spend the big bucks and you shovel in the sales!

Possibly your business is tanking online in the SERPS (search engine results pages). Maybe you have a good looking website. A high-school kid can design you a good web-site. In the implementation of professional SEO is where the cream begins to rise to the top. Your business website can attract the right kind of buyer, the value buyer. People that have been exposed to the hard sale performed by the fake urgency building, big marketing companies are averse to bologna. These folks know what they want and your company can be positioned to make the sale. The sale will be more profitable than the big advertised product or service. You can realize a much better ROI (return on investment) than your high rolling competitors.

The key is in the delivery of the company message. Free industry information that exceeds all of your competitors will sell. I know because I have done it. It works.

Your web-site will be lost in the forest if you have the mindset of your competitors and try the old ways of link-building. The problem is that it may be hard to get your site out of the forest if you continue down the old roads that used to work. The internet is much larger than ever before but there has never been more opportunity! The rise of social media, along with the elimination of Black Hat tactics, means that only quality will prevail in the future. If you have quality content, your site will remain on top in the SERPS and be frequented by many unique visitors daily. Your company will grow with only profitable business! A web-site is cheap to run as you probably realize. Never think however that results equal expenditures made! Effort equals results on the internet. Once your site is optimized for Social Media, you can take the reins, in house and carefully navigate through the web and remain on top.

ROI is the key to successful advertising. The future is the internet and your business needs to get listed in the SERPS on page one. Page one will afford your business a steady stream of quality business. Real-time advertising and an ability to change message and not become married to it are two great reasons to consider getting noticed online.

Get Noticed!

-Bob W

Social Media Scares More than CNN

According to an article from Webpronews.com, “CNN President is really afraid of Social Media.” The article states that the President of CNN feels “far more worried about the 500 million people on Facebook than I am about two million people watching Fox.”

If the President of CNN feels threatened by Social Media, just think for a moment how the President of Google must feel. As I have stated several times before, Social Media is so big that big search may be at a point of transition. Already, Google has endeavored to engage a little social activity of its own with its Buzz offering. All of big search is devoting many recourses catering to Social Media in order to stay current.

I must repeat myself that the old methods of link building are just about dead. Social Media has many choices, some 500 plus and who really knows? These choices are networked for a real and powerful interactive media. Social Media is in and to be harnessed by people who know what they are doing. Content is paramount and necessary. At least in my model to get listed quickly, these are what I currently use. There are other ways to do it, I am sure but for my skill set and to my knowledge, Social Media is the way to succeed.

-Bob W

Search Engine Market Share Pie

Pie Graph of Search Market Share - link juice provided for SEOmoz.com

The Static Internet was a simpler place where one could enter, search and find information. Back-Links once regarded in this simpler era, as a vote of confidence in a new an emerging internet have been exploited and abused beyond reasonable validity. Links were the way to Page Rank and too easily acquired in the link free-for-all’s all over the web. The majority of the activity was inorganic and sought out by website operators to self-induce better rankings by trading links, etc. This type of self promotion was beginning to pollute the organic results sought for by the search engines. The original back-link idea was predicated upon end users that enjoyed a particular site would vote for it with a back-link. This old idea was all but destroyed by the linked crazed site owners seeking self promotion and the black hat exploiters. The search engines met this challenge with their own methods to filter out these self generated links and the spam that threatened the user experience of the free search engines. The method Google used for tabulating the old link method was called Page Rank.

Page Rank was a system that attributed value to sites based upon the back-linking and popularity as demonstrated by incoming links vs. outbound links. A mathematical equation was used to discern the Page Rank of a given site. This worked for some time but the inorganic use of back-linking was a continuing cancer of which big search spent a lot of resources to control. Page Rank seemed to be the honest vehicle in a dishonest world by which to deliver organic results to the masses.

Big search worked at filtering the junk out of the rankings. Good, unique and fresh content was rewarded not only by the human experience of organic back-linking, but with a higher PR afforded by the search engines. The sites that were deemed “authoritative” received a higher PR. These along with the blogs and forums were positioned by PR higher than sites with less content. The educational sites and non-profits, the respective “.org” and “.edu” sites received higher PR. This was reflected in the SERPS.

A couple of things began to happen with technology and more folks logging onto broadband connections, etc. A more sophisticated end user began to demand a straight doorway to a more personal experience. Blogs were still popular seemingly to spite PR. The natural inclination of free commerce is always for profit. Big search had its eye on pay-per-click advertising and began to feel threatened by building up PR on some websites. Big search did not want anyone selling back-links to the highest bidder. So as the drive for profit rules, some websites that had gained high PR because of great content, being they forums or blog sites with ever-changing content, started selling their links to lower ranking websites. This would have undermined that natural and organic model that propelled Google to the top and made big search the doorway to the internet. Big search wanted to control this selling of links so it moved to devalue the very things it held high, fresh and changing content. Rich content sites & Blogs were downgraded in PR sometime in early ’07 for fear of link selling. Many great sites were whacked in half. I had a few websites that went from PR4 to PR2 in one swoop.

Something else took place of the old PR method however. The results in the SERPS for Google remained for my regional results, but in the national SERPS that are mixed into the results; my authoritative sites fell against some of the larger sites with less content. This had to do with PR and another type of filter or manipulation by the search engines. The end result was a balance for a while until the black hats began to dominate the Adwords and Adsense programs with spam websites and garbage infiltrated the ranks of the SERPS. For quite some time Google’s own model was threatened by the hijacking of its own money making advertising programs. It took some time for Google to get off the profit taking and clean up its act.

Finally, Google policed its results by dumping paid advertisers in order to keep the world of search organic and honest. This had to be done as real people were getting tired of the experience of searching through the SERPS for what should have appeared on top. Black hat paid advertisers were destroying organic search. Thank you Google, even if it was a little late. (I wrote about this before the dumping of advertisers with great angst.) Google’s competitors started to sound off about the actions they were taking to improve their offerings.

In the current state of Googling, PR is outranked by content. What does this say about PR? PR is just an element of the criteria that is weighed for the real ranking, that of the SERPS. PR has its place as it does rule in many areas of search, but when it comes to content and a regional element, PR is not the deciding factor in getting listed in the SERPS.

Shall we consider PR as a fading element of yesterday’s methodology? I think so. I think we are seeing the reemergence of the human element in social media. PR was built upon skewed backlink math and it is not a real measure of a site’s popularity. Social media sites are inundated with garbage and the search engines are easily filtering out the good from the spam. It seems that big search is set-up to do this in an efficient way. So called “NOFOLLOW” links on sites like Twitter are noticed by Google and position well as referred links. The Google machine sees these links and they get into the results in the SERPS. The Google machine also sees content with its artificial intelligence that above all, will reward the true purveyors of interesting information. Real people are beginning to be harnesses to “tweet,” “dig” or “bookmark” their favorites on these social sites.

Google will continue to regard these sites as very important as they represent a threat to big search. As social media continues, it will refine itself into many doorways for many end users on the internet. Big search has positioning itself to not only harness this new media, but to build its own brand of social media. The networking that is currently in place has big search shaking, but there is hope. Search has realized that because it is so big, more leaches can suck its blood (and yours) and it can fall and be hurt terribly if it does not return to the simple organic results of yesterday.

“A hunger for interactivity will prevail…”

Social Media

Social Media Growing like a weed - link juice provided for wpsmallbusiness.com

Social sites will also continue to refine, but not for the same reasons big search refines. A hunger for interactivity will prevail as real people can interact with each other. This service is unique to social media while search is a more private deal. Social media has its own limits set by its users as to what is visible and what is held back from the public. This is specifically why the social attempts like Google’s own “Buzz,” where the push for one to open their own personal contacts into the open air will not work. People want to keep some areas of their internet experience private and the mix of social with email contacts will be rejected by the masses. For instance: Just about everyone that has a job would want for their personal ramblings and excesses to be kept from public view.

The mix continues and it seems that big search will either rise to the occasion with a truly human experience that attracts people organically, or a new type of social search will enter to assume some of the traffic and to act as a multi-faceted and different kind of doorway to the internet.

-Bob W

The Sandbox Effect – Double Double Cross?

I have written about it. Many people have written about this grey topic that is a negative to the website designer’s vocation. The sandbox effect is real and it is currently an obstacle that stands in between you and getting a newly launched website noticed in the SERPS. There are interesting observations however that you may want to consider.

We expected Yahoo and especially Bing to employ a new site filter aggressively because of the “quality vs. quantity” mantra that Bing has exuded from the rafters of late. Google is expected to employ this type of filter also as it tries so desperately to return to organic quality results.

First, let us explore the reason for this filter and then the current implications of its use by big search. First of all it is the constant work of those who have become known as “black hats” that causes these giant purveyors of search to endeavor to control their successes. Automated linking schemes and reciprocal linking strategies threatened the very core element of big search rankings. These efforts were artificial and to get your site up there in the SERPS, you had to employ some of them because of the influences of those that hijacked the SERPS. Now everything has changed. After much activity in the shadows, the black hats evolved to hijack the pay-per-click marketplace. Finally after the threat was realized and big search recognized that real people doing real searches were getting frustrated with spammed results, Bing came out and voiced the intent to bring up the quality level of their search offering. With the merger with Yahoo, Microsoft’s intent to clean up search was taken very seriously by Google. Google took on a proactive approach even cleansing tens of thousands of paying members of its Awords program. Google also employs an aggressive new site filter. The strange part of the current state of new site SERPS placement is that Bing has opened its doors to new sites. Yahoo has also not filtered new sites out of the SERPS.

I cannot take risks with clients’ websites and their internet exposure. What I do is to take a lot of risk with my own sites. Now in launching a new site, it appears that if you are conservative about your back-linking strategy, only seeking one way back-links from high ranking sites along with social marketing and press releases, you can hit the SERPS within a week! Now this is limited to Yahoo and Bing. I have had Google crawl new websites, obviously indexing the pages but not listing them listed in Webmaster Tools. After about 24 hrs. or so, the new sites that were showing up on Google highly ranked in the SERPS, because of my expert in page and careful linking strategies. Then they drop off the face of the earth. A check of Webmaster Tools reveals that the sitemaps are updated every day as I update materials on the sites, but no listing of URL’s being indexed is available. This is certainly reflective of the reality that Google indexed my brand new sites and then employed a new site filter that has sent them to the sandbox. Below is a screen capture of the sitemap page in Webmaster Tools.

Sitemap Page from Webmaster Tools

Is the old double-double cross that we see? Who knows exactly why but we can see what is going on right now. Think about this for a minute. Bing exudes this grand intention to make their brand of search “Bing & decide” a clean and organic new style of experience for the end user that even feels good to advertisers. Independent business owners and operators are attracted to this idea of “Bing & decide.” The powerful new look of Bing attracts people while Google maintains its clean (but now more cluttered) look. Google looks over its proverbial shoulder and decides to act after the new Bing gives Google something to focus upon. Google decides to purge itself of its junk that threatens its organic search results. Google has done a lot of work and it is actively doing “Spring cleaning.”

As Bing watches while Google begins to clean up its act, the marketplace is going through its own purging. In brick and mortar establishments across this land many companies are going belly-up and established websites are shutting down. New start-ups are getting ready to capitalize on the Spring, post-tax season, early-summer sales season. Now these are the new entrepreneurs and even the businesses are left standing that want to try a new website launch to get the exposure they need for growth. These are the businesses that will pay for the services that big search provides. Bing is looking to peel off some of the advertisers from Google. It won’t be hard to do.

Google has made a lot of people angry with its big purge of advertisers. There are many that were caught in the snare and dumped that were not guilty of anything. By opening up and reducing the burden upon new websites, Bing may just be positioned in a happier place to capitalize on this big negative.

Speaking of negatives, for a website design company or an SEO company, the divulging of the real aspects of the sandbox effect to you, a business owner may affect your decision to move on a campaign to exploit free search. The SEO’s that do not tell you the whole story are not looking out for your best interests. You should know exactly what is happening and the prospects of getting your site highly ranked in the SERPS. Now is the time to move and to get your website ranked. Engage the services of the best SEO professional you can find. I am making the argument that I am your man.

-Bob W

New Sites: Sandbox on Google


There are theories (called sandbox theories) as to why new sites take time to be listed on some SERPS on Google. The “Sandbox” effect was a theory years ago that was generally accepted among SEO experts. The sandbox theory was an explanation in response to apparent delays in new sites getting into the results in the SERPS. For a brief time at the end of 2003 to 2004, the sandbox was eliminated for a while and there was a “reverse sandbox” effect theorized because new sites for several months during the period, gained almost immediate and seemingly undeserved SERP results.

There is disagreement among the experts as to the existence of the sandbox and how the indexing of new sites works, but there is something going on that limits new sites from reaching the top. The general consensus is that because of spammers and manipulators, new sites are filtered out and some refer to this as the sandbox effect. The impetus for the sandbox effect is simple. Black Hats have caused sandbox measures to be employed. Some website owners have developed new sites, or spread a large site over several URL’s with smaller pages of specific topics for the purpose of back-linking to the main site and gaining high SERP results for the main site. Google rejects any efforts to manipulate the rankings. Google, Yahoo, Bing and the rest will catch up to the manipulators that affect the authenticity of the SERPS. There is an admitted sandbox effort over at Bing. Hopefully in this new age of fast and changing content, search will find a way to eliminate the sandbox for viable new sites.

The need for the sandbox effect just demonstrates that the unsavory among us are taxing the search engines from doing their job, delivering truly organic results. The search engines are designed to deliver results from popular websites. These sites that rank are supposed to be from a result of human beings visiting the sites and back-linking to interesting sites. These are human votes of confidence. The vast majority of links on the web are generated by requests from site owners to other site owners requesting in-organic backlinks. Herein lays the problem. We see that the search engines are not equipped to handle the situation without major resources being expended or measures such as the sandbox being utilized. A newer way of indexing sites may move to the fore.

Sites that generate many, even thousands of back-links in a short period of time are suspect. search engines can pick these sites out easily and should forget the sandbox and put them on an island far away. This is not the case however. These sites seem to be back in the SERP rankings in several months after being penalized in a type of sandbox.

We shall see the results of the efforts put forth to quash the enemies of organic results. In the interim, we have the reality of viable sites being penalized for the sins of spammers. The current average to expect for your new site to be fully resulted in the SERPS and out of the sandbox is about 6 – 8 months.

A gradual incline in the number of back-links is considered best to keep your new site off the radar screens. Favorable SERP results should be expected from a quality SEO effort on a new website in about the 6 month timeframe. Existing sites can see almost immediate results (a month is a reasonable time-frame to expect results).
sandbox keywords
keywords from this page

Keyword density for this page is listed above.

The theory behind the sandbox is a viable one.

Meta Tags – The Head of the Page


Below is an example of the hidden head meta tag section of a website page. Each page should have this meta tag structure and it should never be neglected, even though there is argument among some in the SEO industry as to the importance of meta tags.

Google does not seem to rely upon all of the meta tag information in head of the page to index content, however many sites still do run on meta information. As we know backlinks are so very important and a Meta Search Engine that provides a good backlink is a valuable to your SEO strategy. The fact that Google will index a site without the meta tag information is no reason to leave this out of the code. The meta tags do serve a purpose as you will see the description tag information in the indexed listing in the SERPS from time to time.

The head of the page:


<title>(Title Here)</title>
<meta name="description" content="(write a sentence here)">
seperated by commas)">
<META name="robots" content="INDEX,FOLLOW">
<META name="revisit-after" content="30 Days">
<META name="email" content="(email address of webmaster)">
<META name="author" content="(author)">
<META name="copyright" content="(name and year)">
<head>

Most html editors (that is design software) do not render the meta tag information for the end user. You have to check the html code for the tags at the top of each page. You have to hand insert the information for each page. The list above will give the s information that help in the indexing and crawling of your website. The information between the quote ( “ ” ) marks should be customized for your particular website.

Be careful not to delete any information when pasting your tag code into the head of the page. When you have pasted your meta tag into the head information, look for duplication between the head tags. There are limits to each line and tag information and s follow guidelines to keep the system consolidated (for size) and policed (for spammers).
Title Tag

As each tag is limited, so should your pages be but for the title, keywords are imperative. The main topic should be embellished to a point of less than 5% keyword saturation in the site copy (words on the page) and be contained in the title. The main keyword for the topic of the page should appear early in the tag. Limit for Google Title Tag indexing is 70 charachters (including spaces). Use every one wisely in the title of your page.
Description Tag

The description tag should contain a basic sentence or a variant of a sentence rich in keywords. The sentence should be no more than 160 characters long in the description as that is the Gogle limit. Yahoo and Bing index the first 200 of the description but stay with the 160 description tag and make them count. The Title will be displayed in the SERPS and the description tag will be displayed under the Title. So you have two chances to attract a visitor in the SERPS if your description tag shines. This is not to be a keyword stuffing endeavor in the description tag.

Search engines will scrape your site and fill in the SERPS with keywords relative to the search query even if the page is devoid of a description. It may be a good tactic to leave the description tag barren between the quotes ot leave it out altogether. If your company has a few keywords that hit regularly and this is the object, devising a description tag is best. If your site has a diversity of information even on particular pages, it may be advisable to leave the description tag empty. This is a matter to be determined.
Keywords Tag

The keywords tag is probably the most interesting Meta Tag. It is this area within the head of the page, between the quote marks that has been the focus of much attention. Search engines have devised algorithms to keep keyword spammers from manipulating the SERPS with tricks like repeated keywords. Keywords should not be repeated.. Example:

Keywords should not be repeated except in the plural. The separation of keywords or keyword phrases is just a comma and no space, despite argument from some in the peanut gallery. The Keywords Tag along with the Description and Title Tags tell the which words are important and considered “keywords.” Google reportedly skips the keyword tag altogether. Inktomi Search reportedly is the only major search company still indexing from the keyword tag.

Use an accepted limit of 900 characters (including spaces) 10 – 20 Keywords linitation per page.
Robots Tag

The “robots tag” tells the to crawl or not to crawl. Example as listed above: will give the Search specific instruction to index your site copy and to follow your links. The alternates are “NOINDEX” and “NOFOLLOW” where the will move on for the NOINDEX tag and will not follow your links if the NOFOLLOW tag is employed.
Revisit Tag

Self explanatory, you should stick to 30 days, not get greedy as the s crawl monthly anyway. They will return as they see fit if your content is changing and linked to by other sites.

keywords for this page

The above is an example of the keyword distribution on this page.

Contact us today for a free SEO evaluation by a human being.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1 other follower

Top Posts

  • None
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.